Of Technology, Policing, and Corruption

Posted: October 2, 2013 in Crime News, Policing, Technology & Crime
Tags: , , , , , , ,

At first I was disappointed that this week’s episode of This American Life was a rebroadcast from 2010. I’m glad I listened anyway, though, because it was an excellent podcast about people who refused to remain silent, even when it was in their best interest to simply shutup.

Image courtesy of Simon Howden / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of Simon Howden / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Of the two stories, the most riveting was about Adrian Schoolcraft, a former New York City police officer who secretly recorded his conversations with fellow officers and police administrators for nearly a year and a half back in 2008 and 2009.

The aftermath of that — multiple internal affairs investigations, a book about corruption in the NYPD based on the recordings, and Schoolcraft himself being thrown into a mental hospital by a deputy chief to silence him — is incredibly compelling.

The tapes also figured prominently in the recent court decision declaring the NYPD’s stop and frisk practices to be unconstitutional.

Graham Rayman wrote about the tapes and their content in a series of articles for the Village Voice back in 2010:

They reveal that precinct bosses threaten street cops if they don’t make their quotas of arrests and stop-and-frisks, but also tell them not to take certain robbery reports in order to manipulate crime statistics. The tapes also refer to command officers calling crime victims directly to intimidate them about their complaints.

As a result, the tapes show, the rank-and-file NYPD street cop experiences enormous pressure in a strange catch-22: He or she is expected to maintain high “activity”—including stop-and-frisks—but, paradoxically, to record fewer actual crimes.

This pressure was accompanied by paranoia—from the precinct commander to the lieutenants to the sergeants to the line officers—of violating any of the seemingly endless bureaucratic rules and regulations that would bring in outside supervision.

In other words, the tapes reveal the dysfunctional backdrop against which policing occurred in at least one New York City precinct in recent years. Other retired NYPD officers have confirmed the same types of issues in their precincts as well, but the overall scope of any problems in the NYPD isn’t clear.

An unexpected driver (for me, at least) of this reported dysfunction is the use of statistical information to predict and prevent crime. Compstat, the NYPD’s ground breaking approach to so-called “hot spot” policing, turns out to be one of the villains in Schoolcraft’s tale.

Image courtesy of  nokhoog_buchachon / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of nokhoog_buchachon / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

What should be a tool to effectively manage police resources and direct them at trouble spots in the city became instead a weapon wielded against police officers to control and monitor their work on the one hand, and as a set of troublesome facts to be manipulated and minimized by administrators on the other.

It’s a troubling reminder that research, technology, and information is rarely neutral in its application. Political interests often trump the truth, and Schoolcraft’s ordeal is a graphic example of that.

Society too often views technology as a saviour. Unfortunately, it can’t replace the human element, at least not in policing.

What are your thoughts? Can we use technology to reduce police corruption (police body cameras?), or is that just yet another blind alley?

Share this post with all your favorite services!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

  1. Brittius says:

    The Patrolman’s Benevolent Association opposes the CopCam type cameras because every item of uniform apparel is subjected to the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the NYPD/NYC. The 14th Floor, has not given any statement(s), from what I have read.
    Something very screwed up happened in the Eight-One, and the more I read about it, the less I like it. Something was going on that should have been stopped at the very beginning, before tape recordings and other actions resulted.
    The bosses can downgrade crimes per the mayor, but then they must answer for their actions if demanded. I do not agree with it but, the job is to be a cop, and leave politics to others that get the big bucks in their paychecks. That, is the long, and the short, of it. You say, “Yes, Sir”, and do your job, whether you agree with it or not.
    Stop & Frisk, did save lives, and never should have been stopped. Community residents complain about crime. Stop & Frisk addressed many issues. Usually, from what I hear, the people complaining about it, want it stopped because it interferes with the drug activities or other criminal behavior(s) or those complaining. I have heard people complaining about Stop & Frisk and then, somewhere along the conversation, up pops the drivel about legalizing drugs. Don’t complain to the cop about them doing their job, go complain to the State Senator, or State Assemblyman, about changing the laws.
    Personally, I would wear a body camera, and if false allegations arise, I would simply arrest the person for Filing a False Police Report, or Obstructing Governmental Administration, and “Systemize” them. Photographable offense, no Desk Appearance Ticket. Camera images plus sound makes a great documentation of crime that can be given to Early Case Assessment Bureau, and other court proceedings as applicable.


Leave a Comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s